![]() While prosecutors say the site published many ads that depicted children who were victims of sex trafficking, no one in the federal case in Arizona is charged with sex trafficking or child sex trafficking. Lacey and Larkin have said the site never allowed ads for sex and used people and automated tools to try to delete such ads. The defense lawyers opted not to deliver an opening statement so they could instead prepare a written mistrial motion. They said, among other things, that Jones didn’t properly notify them about claims he planned to make in his opening statement and that he violated the defendants’ right to remain silent when he said they “can’t deny” they knew the vast majority of Backpage ads were for prostitution. District Judge Susan Brnovich to declare a mistrial. The government shut down the site in 2018.ĭefense attorneys asked Phoenix-based U.S. He said the website developed a partnership with a website where customers wrote reviews of prostitutes, which drove significant traffic to Backpage. Jones alleged that Backpage managers hired content moderates whose job was not to remove prostitution ads but to edit them so they weren’t so blatant. “These defendants knew that these were prostitution ads but they didn’t shut down the website, they didn’t prevent these ads from being posted on the website,” prosecutor Reginald Jones told jurors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |